Mike Daisey
had a podcast on “This American Life” as well as a play that told a story about
his trip to China. He posed as a businessman so that he could get inside the
company when what he really wanted to do was get information on the companies
working conditions. This play is a critique of the
Apple company and what they
put their employees through. Come to find out most of the story was not true
but rather a bunch of made up stories to make the company seem horrible. Very
little of what Daisey said is actually true. This leads to the podcast “The
Retraction” which tells of all the lies Daisey put in his story. I’m glad they
retracted the original podcast and took the time to explain what happened. It
is important for everyone to know the truth.
This story is very public and in fact was the podcast on This American
Life that that attracted the most listeners. The listener’s were not aware that
what they were listening to was not true. Upon listening to the podcast you’re
head is filled with horrible visions of guards with guns at the doors, under aged
workers, people being overworked and a man who got his hand mangled by one of
these machines and not get any medical attention. It makes think very poorly of
China and this company. This then affects the company’s image and could
potentially affect their business, over lies. This is not fair at all.
I understand that Daisey is not a journalist but he made everyone think
that his story was true which makes it not right. If Daisey were to label his
work as fiction there wouldn’t be anything wrong with it. The parts he made up
were to give his work drama and make it more interesting. It was to attract the
readers’ attention which is what you do in writing. For example, Daisey said
that he spoke with a man who got his hand mangled by a machine that made Ipads
yet the man had never used an Ipad or seen one turned on ever in his life.
Daisey makes the point that he’s never even used and Ipad yet this device made him
lose his hand. It brings emotion to the story and overall just makes it better,
but when the reader thinks this is true it makes them dislike the Apple company
as I said before it is not fair to them.
I think that the story would have been fine if Daisey would have labeled
his work. Instead, he chose to lie about the trip, and continues to lie even
after the truth has come out. It's almost like someone starting a rumor about you causing you to lose all of your friends. It’s just not okay in any way to basically ruin
this company’s or China’s reputation over a story that isn’t true.
Brittany,
ReplyDelete"Very little of what Daisey said is actually true."
This is kind of the risk of this whole fiasco I was talking about. The problem is, a lot of the stuff in Daisey's podcast WAS true, but because he decided to include a few exagerrations and move around the timeline a bit, people then listen to "Retraction" and think the whole thing was a lie. This is why I put on the board that day "what is the risk of what Daisey did?" One major thing is that he made a real issue seem almost like a complete lie.
Which brings up an interesting question: is this fiction or not? What IS fiction and what is not?
Great post. Keep going deeper.
-Filip